Abstract:
This study explores the concept of risk in outdoor recreation. The methodology consists of a literature review and semi-structured, in-depth interviewing of five 'risk-takers'. Well-documented societal assumptions posit risk as undesirable. This contrasts with the experiences of the research participants, for whom risk in outdoor recreation is affirming of human development. A further finding is justification of risk can occur on two levels; cost/benefit and ideological. It is concluded that recognition of risk-activities as an affirming ideology is important so that they continue to be valued and allowed.
