Abstract:
This thesis is on the topic of interdependence. It examines various supposed facets of interdependence emphasising the theoretical aspects associated with the phenomenon. The results of research carried out by numerous scholars are examined and the consequent definitional problems discussed.
The central theme of the thesis, however, is an examination of the linkage between the interdependence paradigm and reality using two current and important issue-areas, those of international marine fisheries and international trade. These issue-areas are analysed and examined against four dependent variables namely :
i international agenda and inter-state relations;
ii nation-state influence and asymmetries;
iii nation-states' interests and "common interest" groups; and
iv nation-states' multiple channels of contact.
Next, the problems associated with the relationship between interdependence and dependence are discussed. For example, political leaders who speak of global interdependence often ignore the fact that the capacities to harm, to disrupt and to coerce by economic means are not distributed equally. In addition, dependency theorists too often assume that only developing states are vulnerable, and academic writers on interdependence often appear insufficiently interested in the implications of dependency.
In order to highlight that increases in interdependence are not necessarily beneficial, an examination of its relationship to peace (or lack of it) is provided; too often one finds an implicit assumption that interdependence is a good thing per se.
The thesis does not purport to present a general theory of international politics or even a general theory of the politics of global interdependence. Emphasis has been placed on the relationship between the theoretical part of interdependence and the practical side of issue-areas.
