Abstract:
The courts' treatment of privative clauses has rendered them meaningless. This raises an
unnecessary debate about the distribution to power between Parliament and the courts. A
solution to this problem is needed which allows either side to preserve their constitutional
role, while also recognising that sometimes it is in the interests of good administration for the
courts to exercise restraint. Interpreting privative clauses as a Parliamentary indication of the
need to defer to a decision maker's judgment achieves this.