Abstract:
Conventional wisdom suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However using data from New Zealand - where CEO compensation committee membership is relatively common - we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged six percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1997-2005 period. After controlling for variation in firm performance the difference is a still-sizeable four percentage points. This puzzling result cannot be explained by risk-return tradeoff considerations interaction with other governance variables selection bias or variable mis-measurement.
