Repository logo

School of Economics and Finance · Te Kura Ohaoha Pūtea: Working Paper Series

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/21216

The School of Economics and Finance has an active research environment with very strong links to business, government and financial institutions in Wellington and wider New Zealand.

Browse

Browsing School of Economics and Finance · Te Kura Ohaoha Pūtea: Working Paper Series by Author "Cavallo, Eduardo"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Precautionary strategies and household savings
    (Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, 2015) Aizenman, Joshua; Cavallo, Eduardo; Noy, Ilan
    Why do people save? A strand of the literature has emphasized the role of ‘precautionary’ motives; i.e., private agents save in order to mitigate unexpected future income shocks. An implication is that in countries faced with more macroeconomic volatility and risk, private saving should be higher. From the observable data, however, we find a negative correlation between risk and private saving in cross-country comparisons, particularly in developing countries. We provide a plausible explanation for the disconnect between precautionary-saving theory and the empirical evidence that is based on a model with a richer account for the various modes of ‘precautionary’ behavior by private agents, in cases where institutions are weaker and labor informality is prevalent. In such environments, household saving decisions are intertwined with firms’ investment decisions. As a result, the interaction between saving behavior, broadly construed, and aggregate risk and uncertainty, may be more complex than is frequently assumed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemRestricted
    Where is the money? Post-disaster foreign aid flows
    (Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, 2013) Becerra, Oscar; Cavallo, Eduardo; Noy, Ilan
    We describe the flows of aid after large catastrophic natural disasters by using the extensive record of bilateral aid flows, by aid sector, available through the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee. For each large donor, we identify the extent of cross-sector re-allocation that is occurring in the aftermath of large disasters whereby humanitarian aid increases but other types of aid may decrease. Our evidence suggests that the expectation of large surges in post disaster aid flows is not warranted given the past diversity of experience of global foreign aid by donor and by event. We find no evidence, however, that donors reallocate aid between recipient countries (cross-recipient reallocation). These observations suggest that countries which are predicted to face increasing losses from natural disasters in the coming decades (and almost all are) should be devoting significant resources for prevention, insurance, and mitigation.