Klement, Alon2015-02-112022-07-072015-02-112022-07-0721/01/20112011https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19178This seminar examines the effects that the private selection of arbitrators has over arbitrators' incentives in deciding the cases before them and over the arbitrators' implied bias. These effects have important implications for the design of Arbitration rules by Arbitration and Dispute Resolution providers as well as by other organisations that rely on arbitration for the resolution of disputes among their members. Professor Klement shows that private selection of arbitrators might adversely affect the accuracy of arbitrators' decisions because arbitrators might want to make a incorrect decision when a correct decision would carry the inference that they are biased. He compares the accuracy of arbitrators' decisions under different arbitrator selection procedures.pdfen-NZPermission to publish research outputs of the New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation has been granted to the Victoria University of Wellington Library. Refer to the permission letter in record: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/18870arbitrationdispute resolutionselection proceduresText