Beasley, Rose2016-12-212022-07-072016-12-212022-07-0720162016https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19660Research problem: Resource list management systems (RLMSs) have recently seen a significant increase in popularity, but previous research has not fully explored the differences in uptake of these systems in different academic disciplines within a university setting. This research addresses this problem by identifying and exploring these differences in two academic faculties at the University of Auckland. Methodology: This research was focussed on Semester 1 2016, and used a mixed-methods case study approach comprised of statistics generated from the virtual learning environment, Canvas, and Talis, the RLMS implemented at the University of Auckland. Seven semi-structured interviews were then conducted with a range of Subject Librarians and academic staff, and the results were analysed and themes identified. Results: Three main themes in the uptake of Talis were identified – individual resistance, organisational approach, and disciplinary need. Disciplinary need was found to be the main factor affecting academic use of Talis. Implications: This research adds to the body of knowledge surrounding RLMS implementations, and may offer some insights to other universities implementing similar systems. Future research could take the form of wider studies looking at a larger range of disciplines, or more generalizable studies focussed on testing the findings discussed here.pdfen-NZAcademic librariesReading listsAcademic disciplineResource list management systemsResource listsLibrary systemsText