Seeing and being seen as a management learning and education scholar: Rejoinder to ‘Identifying Research Topic Development in Business and Management Education Research Using Legitimation Code Theory’

Bridgman, T.2018-04-192022-07-1120162018-04-192022-07-1120162016https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/20328We greatly appreciate the editors’ invitation to respond to Arbaugh et al’s (2016) thought-provoking article about the current state of business and management education (BME) research. As incoming and current co-editors of Management Learning, it is an excellent opportunity to contribute to a discussion about how we in the management learning and education community see ourselves and want to be seen by others, both within the academy and beyond.pdfen-NZhttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use-1Management, Education, knowledge, legitimacySeeing and being seen as a management learning and education scholar: Rejoinder to ‘Identifying Research Topic Development in Business and Management Education Research Using Legitimation Code Theory’TextSAGE Publications