Winsley, Alexander2014-05-012021-11-142014-05-012021-11-142013-01-012013-01-01https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/14108https://api.figshare.com/v2/account/articles/17006713https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17006713This paper explores the balancing act between freedom of expression and hate speech. It takes its cue from a recent dialogue between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron concerning democratic legitimacy. This dialogue forms the conceptual starting point for the paper, and a detailed analysis of democratic principles will follow. Robert Post’s participatory theory of democracy is critiqued, and his recent conversion to democratic relativism is analysed. The operation of hate speech laws in Canada and New Zealand will both be assessed in order to see how both of these countries treat the issue of democratic legitimacy.en-NZDemocratic legitimacyHate speechFreedom of expressionCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990Text2021-11-14