Repository logo
 

Competing Discourses in Social and Environmental Accounting: an Overview of the Conceptual Landscape

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2004

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington

Abstract

In recent years there has been a marked resurgence of interest in the areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social and environmental accounting (SEA) among business, Governments, public policymakers, investors, unions, environmentalists and others. While at one level there appears to be widespread agreement that CSR and SEA are worthy topics of attention, different groups have very different understandings of these fields. This article provides a meta-analysis of these differences by comparing three broad approaches to SEA: the business case, stakeholder-accountability and critical theory approaches. It also responds to concerns a number of commentators have expressed regarding the current dominance of 'business case' discourses. While not seeking to impose on readers a 'correct' way of viewing SEA and CSR, exposure to competing perspectives is viewed as one way of challenging us to think more reflectively about the frames available to us and their implications for the social realities we construct, embed or seek to change.

Description

Keywords

Business value, Corporate responsibility, Value systems, Discourse analysis, Economic value, Social value

Citation