Repository logo
 

In Defence of s 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBisam, Aishath
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T02:38:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-01T21:54:58Z
dc.date.available2012-06-28T02:38:44Z
dc.date.available2022-11-01T21:54:58Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThis paper will investigate whether s 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 has undermined the purpose of the Act, which is to consolidate and improve the law relating to arbitration by enhancing party autonomy and limiting judicial intervention by enforcing the finality of arbitral awards. The paper will discuss the problems associated with s 69 in the light of safeguards provided for in the Act. It will then analyse and summarise the rulings of cases involving s 69 in United Kingdom. The paper will then focus on how arbitration operates in New Zealand, by drawing a comparison with the arbitration framework of United Kingdom.en_NZ
dc.formatpdfen_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/28020
dc.languageen_NZ
dc.language.isoen_NZ
dc.publisherTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectInternational arbitrationen_NZ
dc.subjectSection 69en_NZ
dc.titleIn Defence of s 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996en_NZ
dc.typeTexten_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineLawen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unitSchool of Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.subject.marsden390104 Commercial and Contract Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuwMasters Research Paper or Projecten_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
270.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
Download

Collections