Repository logo
 

The evaluation of remediation technology: a case of multiple criteria decision making

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jennifer Lauren
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-21T01:52:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T20:30:43Z
dc.date.available2011-06-21T01:52:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T20:30:43Z
dc.date.copyright1999
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores current decision making practices in the selection of remediation technology, with the aim that future decisions will be consistent, justifiable, open to inspection and able to withstand detailed scrutiny. No prior research has collated, compared or critiqued the various methodologies currently in use for the selection of remediation technologies, nor has there been any observation and/or critique of the decision processes used in a real case. This lack of knowledge was addressed through an extensive literature review and observation of a live New Zealand case (Site X) which provided first hand examination of current remediation decision making practices. This study trials and advocates the use of a decision making framework incorporating Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Visual Interactive Modelling in general, and the use of Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis (V.I.S.A.) in particular. The intent of the inquiry was also to research the nature and extent of site contamination in New Zealand; and provide a broad overview of remediation. The selection of remediation technology was found to be complex given the diversity of stakeholder interest, the size of the financial and environmental stakes, the existence of multiple (often intangible and conflicting) criteria, and the paucity and limitations of decision aids used currently in remediation problems. The decision making model used by the Site X Decision Team was typical of many found in the literature, in that there was a lack of attention to both procedural details and the tenets of Decision Science. However, the post analysis of the Site X model results revealed that the decision was robust, and also that V.I.S.A could provide insight into the decision dynamics in a manner which was not possible through traditional, non-interactive methods. The research demonstrates that V.I.S.A., which combines both the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique and Visual Interactive Modelling capability, has the ability to provide a generic, appropriate, consistently applied methodology for use when developing a model for the selection of remediation technologies in New Zealand.en_NZ
dc.formatpdfen_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/24842
dc.languageen_NZ
dc.language.isoen_NZ
dc.publisherTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
dc.rights.holderAll rights, except those explicitly waived, are held by the Authoren_NZ
dc.rights.licenseAuthor Retains Copyrighten_NZ
dc.rights.urihttps://www.wgtn.ac.nz/library/about-us/policies-and-strategies/copyright-for-the-researcharchive
dc.subjectDecision makingen_NZ
dc.subjectPollutionen_NZ
dc.subjectCase studiesen_NZ
dc.titleThe evaluation of remediation technology: a case of multiple criteria decision makingen_NZ
dc.typeTexten_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineManagement Studiesen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Management Studiesen_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuwAwarded Research Masters Thesisen_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
18.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections