Repository logo
 

A theory of common law incorporation of indigenous legal systems and the origin and nature of common law indigenous rights

dc.contributor.authorOgden, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-07T00:18:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.available2011-03-07T00:18:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.copyright2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractWe give equal respect to a culture when we allow it to govern itself by its own legal system, and when this legal system is accorded equal status. The continuation of Indigenous legal systems is not related to the manner in which the Crown expanded its territories, rather, it comes from a concern for equality of citizenship and protection of difference. If not, our constitutions currently accept the inequality of Indigenous Peoples. Having decided to accord equal respect to the Indigenous legal system, we must then have the means to do so. This respect comes in the form of enforceable common law indigenous rights. Since courts cannot enquire into what is important to another culture these rights must give effect to this culture's laws and legal system rather than vague and difficult concepts like occupation. The existence and content of common law indigenous rights to resources and jurisdiction are proven where the Indigenous legal system attributes itself ownership or jurisdiction. These rights are then subject to any Crown extinguishment. In addition, they extend to cultural property and jurisdiction, areas previously thought covered only by unenforceable treaties. Where Indigenous interests must co-exist with non-Indigenous interests the common law right is not protected in its original state. New rights exist, defined in relation to the competing non-Indigenous interest amid concerns for reconciliation of the opposing cultures and legal systems. Further protection of Indigenous interests is possible in statute or in higher law. In these cases reconciliation with non-Indigenous interests will change the description of the indigenous right in that statute or higher law. Extinguishment occurs where Indigenous interests are inconsistent with Crown rights or interests, and is not permanent. The revival of indigenous rights after extinguishment is important to the acknowledgment of the value of ongoing Indigenous existence. Finally, compensation for loss of these rights is available by operation of the common law.en_NZ
dc.formatpdfen_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/23112
dc.languageen_NZ
dc.language.isoen_NZ
dc.publisherTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
dc.rights.holderAll rights, except those explicitly waived, are held by the Authoren_NZ
dc.rights.licenseAuthor Retains Copyrighten_NZ
dc.rights.urihttps://www.wgtn.ac.nz/library/about-us/policies-and-strategies/copyright-for-the-researcharchive
dc.subjectCommon lawen_NZ
dc.subjectCustomary lawen_NZ
dc.subjectIndigenous peoplesen_NZ
dc.titleA theory of common law incorporation of indigenous legal systems and the origin and nature of common law indigenous rightsen_NZ
dc.typeTexten_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineLawen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Lawsen_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unitSchool of Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuwAwarded Research Masters Thesisen_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
125.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections