Repository logo
 

The clinical utility of the sociomoral reflection measure-short form versus the defining issues test: measuring the moral maturity of adult offenders

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Craig John
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-29T03:06:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-30T19:48:24Z
dc.date.available2011-08-29T03:06:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-30T19:48:24Z
dc.date.copyright2002
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractThe present research was conducted in order to compare two measures of moral judgement maturity, and in order to assess the moral maturity of adult offenders. Rest's Defining Issues Test (DIT) and Gibbs, Basinger, and Fuller's Sociomoral Reflection Measure-Short Form (SRM-SF) were administered to the same sample of 67 adult male offenders, incarcerated at Rimutaka Medium Security Prison (New Zealand). The two measures were compared for clinical utility and in relation to key developmental issues, including ethnicity, level of formal education, socioeconomic status, and age. On both measures, the participants scored at a level consistent with early to late adolescent development. According to DIT norms, their level of moral maturity was slightly higher than that of junior High School students. According to SRM-SF norms, their level of moral maturity was consistent with what would be expected from participants aged between 14 and 17. The participants mean SRM-SF score indicates that they were reasoning at a stage where maintaining relationships and living up to interpersonal expectations is considered important. These results are discussed in light of previous research regarding adult moral maturity. The present research also found that the SRM-SF was sensitive to the participants ethnic identity, level of formal education, and SES. The DIT on the other hand was sensitive to the participants age, with participants aged 32 years or older scoring significantly higher on this measure. The older participants also used significantly more moral type B reasoning. Participants preferred taking the SRM-SF to the DIT. Although the DIT took slightly longer to administer than the SRM-SF, it took less than half the time to score and no prior training was necessary. These results are discussed in relation to how each instrument measures moral maturity, and in terms of moral intervention.en_NZ
dc.formatpdfen_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/26038
dc.languageen_NZ
dc.language.isoen_NZ
dc.publisherTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
dc.rights.holderAll rights, except those explicitly waived, are held by the Authoren_NZ
dc.rights.licenseAuthor Retains Copyrighten_NZ
dc.rights.urihttps://www.wgtn.ac.nz/library/about-us/policies-and-strategies/copyright-for-the-researcharchive
dc.subjectMoral developmenten_NZ
dc.subjectCriminal psychologyen_NZ
dc.subjectReasoningen_NZ
dc.titleThe clinical utility of the sociomoral reflection measure-short form versus the defining issues test: measuring the moral maturity of adult offendersen_NZ
dc.typeTexten_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuwAwarded Research Masters Thesisen_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
38.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections