Repository logo
 

The Weapons Provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

dc.contributor.authorGeorgiou, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-08T01:18:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-02T00:24:41Z
dc.date.available2013-01-08T01:18:53Z
dc.date.available2022-11-02T00:24:41Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThe use of weapons at international law is governed by the law of armed conflict. These laws with regard to weapons are based on two key principles: not causing superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering; and being able to discriminate between military and civilian targets. The law of armed conflict formed the basis of the weapons provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998. The Rome Statute sought to make individuals responsible to an independent international court for the “most serious crimes of international concern”. However the weapons provisions only included weapons that are out of date– poison, asphyxiating and poisonous gases, and expanding and flattening bullets. Nuclear weapons were left out because they are not yet considered fully prohibited at international law and to keep the nuclear weapon States at the negotiating table. Biological and chemical weapons were excluded as fallout from the decision not to include nuclear weapons despite their prohibition long since being considered part of customary international law. The prohibition on anti-personnel landmines was considered too new to be incorporated into the Rome Statute. As a compromise for not including these weapons, the drafters also included the option of adding weapons at a later date to an annex. However, considering the procedural requirements for adding weapons to the annex, it seems unlikely that this provision will ever be used and is almost completely useless. These modern weapons may be covered by other non-weapon specific provisions but this method is not perfect. Although there have been attempts by Mexico and Belgium to amend the Rome Statute, the only successful amendment has seen the criminalisation of the outdated weapons be extended to armed conflicts not of an international character – something missing from the original Statute. This is likely to remain the status quo unless drastic changes occur such as further proliferation of these modern weapons.en_NZ
dc.formatpdfen_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/28286
dc.languageen_NZ
dc.language.isoen_NZ
dc.publisherTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
dc.rights.holderAll rights, except those explicitly waived, are held by the Authoren_NZ
dc.rights.licenseAuthor Retains Copyrighten_NZ
dc.rights.urihttps://www.wgtn.ac.nz/library/about-us/policies-and-strategies/copyright-for-the-researcharchive
dc.subjectInternational criminal lawen_NZ
dc.subjectRome Statuteen_NZ
dc.subjectWeapons of mass destructionen_NZ
dc.subjectLaw of armed conflicten_NZ
dc.titleThe Weapons Provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Courten_NZ
dc.typeTexten_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineLawen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorTe Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellingtonen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelBachelorsen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameBachelor of Laws with Honoursen_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unitSchool of Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.subject.marsden390111 International Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.subject.marsden390106 Criminal Lawen_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuwBachelors Research Paper or Projecten_NZ

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
417.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
form.pdf
Size:
334.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Permission Form (Admin)

Collections