Reconstruction drawings: an interpretation of the language of construction drawings

Abstract

This study interprets the role of construction drawings within contemporary architectural professional practice as reinforcing a schism between the two cultures of design and construction. It discusses how they characterize an authoritative exchange of information between the architect and the builder. The estrangement of the architect from the process of building requires the implementation of construction drawings to communicate the intention of the architect to be the executed by the builder. This study discusses how these drawings have become a neutral element in the production of architecture, towards informing the construction which has also become the neutral application of technology. This is the effect of logics and traditions of representation, changing economic legal aspects of architectural design and building construction that are among the many factors that have contributed to an established dichotomy between architectural ideas and practicalities of building. This study concludes with a proposal for the reunification of ideas (invention) with the making of architecture (execution) subsequently informing a reconstruction of constructions drawings. The reconstructed drawings would occupy an open ended realm of expression representing relationships within the building industry based on collaboration and not a single source of authority. They could then provide a bridge between architectural design and construction. Such a cultural exchange will inevitably reduce the taboos and fears of crossing boundaries, and reinstate the potential for architecture in the form of built works to be invested with collaborative creative expression. It must be stressed that this study presents an open-ended discussion. It does not attempt to seek a single answer in order to reconcile the schism. The practicalities of the current methods of drawing and their suitability to the current methods of building are acknowledged as well as their limitations. Instead the purpose of the study is to present alternatives in order to raise awareness of the topic and invite further discussion.