DSpace Repository

Confronting the Defi Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of the Application of New Zealand's Personal Property Securities Act 1999 to Crytoassets

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Solinas, Matteo
dc.contributor.author Mandhan, Sameer
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-18T01:56:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-18T01:56:15Z
dc.date.copyright 2023 en_NZ
dc.date.issued 2023 en_NZ
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/31405
dc.description.abstract The financial sector is being upended. The major disruptor is decentralised finance (DeFi), which eliminates the need for centralised intermediaries by empowering individuals with peer-to-peer digital exchanges. DeFi has experienced rapid growth over the past few years and its proliferation is likely to continue. DeFi, which uses emerging blockchain technology, is underpinned by cryptoassets such as bitcoin, ether, and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). As DeFi offerings have become increasingly sophisticated, important legal issues have arisen. One such issue is whether the law is appropriately positioned to recognise and give effect to cryptoasset-collateralised lending arrangements. Presently, legal uncertainty poses a substantial risk to market participants, who are for the most part transacting blindly. This paper, therefore, addresses the applicability and comparative suitability of New Zealand’s Personal Property Securities Act 1999 (the PPSA) to cryptoasset collateral arrangements. It argues, using the recent Singaporean case of Chefpierre as a test case, that the PPSA is generally preferable — as regards upholding DeFi parties’ intentions by providing due legal recognition to their arrangements — to the English (and thus Singaporean) approach to secured credit law. Although determining that the PPSA is better positioned than English law to respond to novel cryptoasset collateral arrangements, the author illustrates how the challenges posed by cryptoassets still necessitate a degree of legislative change — in particular, to the PPSA’s perfection requirements and priority rules. Consequently, the author undertakes a thorough review of potential routes to legislative change, including a comparative analysis of legal principles and developments in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The author subsequently recommends that a number of bespoke rules and concepts designed to respond to cryptoassets be introduced into the PPSA, concluding that such reform is a crucial step in New Zealand’s journey to confront the DeFi revolution. en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.subject Cryptoassets en_NZ
dc.subject Security (Interest) en_NZ
dc.subject Personal Property Securities Act 1999 en_NZ
dc.subject Collateral en_NZ
dc.subject Decentralised Finance (DeFi) en_NZ
dc.title Confronting the Defi Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of the Application of New Zealand's Personal Property Securities Act 1999 to Crytoassets en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Bachelors Research Paper or Project en_NZ
thesis.degree.discipline Law en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.level Masters en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Bachelor of Laws en_NZ
dc.subject.course LAWS489 en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.school School of Law en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account