DSpace Repository

MU: formless - An investigation of movable architecture to increase personalisation of home

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Moloney, Jules
dc.contributor.advisor Moleta, Tane
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jun Min
dc.date.accessioned 2013-08-29T02:08:59Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-02T23:39:01Z
dc.date.available 2013-08-29T02:08:59Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-02T23:39:01Z
dc.date.copyright 2013
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/29301
dc.description.abstract For centuries, at least in the western society, architecture has been associated with notions of stasis, timelessness and endurance and these continue to define architecture in the modern society (Croft, 2000; Fox & Kemp, 2009; Lynn, 1977; Zuk & Clark, 1970). [...] However, it is questionable whether the traditional status of architecture is still appropriate in the contemporary society. Current society is dynamic and is subject to frequent transformation. [...] While society has progressed forward, architecture has been held back. Due to this architecture currently potentially fails to take advantage of the opportunities in motion-based developments and falls short in satisfying the demands of modern society (Korkmaz, 2004). [...] In order for architecture to literally survive in the contemporary world, it must evolve and adapt to the new era of vast transformation and movement by utilising what is present, the techniques of kineticism (Fox & Kemp, 2009; Korkmaz, 2004; Lynn, 1997; Zuk & Clark, 1970). Zuk and Clark compares this paradigm to Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution that explains, “the problem of survival always depends upon the capability of an object to adapt in a changing environment”, which also holds true for architecture as it stands at the threshold for a new evolution (1970, p.4). The techniques of kinetics are a vital tool for architecture to survive today’s unpredictably transforming world. In regards to domestic architecture, one of the advantages of such adaptation is that it would increase the ability for it to be personalized, which is a fundamental aspect that constructs a sense home. Currently, personalisation of a house is usually done through choosing the objects in the house such as furniture or colours of the walls (Cooper, 1995). However, utilization of motion in architecture can provide greater opportunities for personalisation, which would eventually assist in obtaining a greater sense of home. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.rights Access is restricted to staff and students only. For information please contact the library. en_NZ
dc.rights Access is restricted to staff and students only. For information please contact the library. en_NZ
dc.subject Movable en_NZ
dc.subject Kinetic en_NZ
dc.subject Korean architecture en_NZ
dc.subject Personalization of home en_NZ
dc.title MU: formless - An investigation of movable architecture to increase personalisation of home en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit School of Architecture en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 120101 Architectural Design en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcseo 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Awarded Research Masters Thesis en_NZ
thesis.degree.discipline Architecture en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.level Masters en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Master of Architecture (Professional) en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account