dc.contributor.author |
Short, Celia Ruth |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-10-10T22:23:08Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-10-31T19:25:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-10-10T22:23:08Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-10-31T19:25:54Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
1977 |
|
dc.date.issued |
1977 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/26836 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In the last twenty years Social Work has undergone an "agonising reappraisal" of itself (Grosser, 1969) in which the social worker's multi-faceted role as therapist, social advocate, professional and bureaucrat has been subjected to a rigorous test of relevancy. Social work's right to intervene, and its effectiveness in that intervention - in terms of its professional and bureaucratic structures and its methodological preferences - has been questioned. Through this, we have been brought to realise how our pre-occupation with methodological concerns over the period 1920-1960 has caused us to lose touch with major social issues of our time. |
en_NZ |
dc.format |
pdf |
en_NZ |
dc.language |
en_NZ |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Role conflict following a change in professional ideology: a thesis which attempts to examine some of the conflicts heightened by the adoption of new “non-casework” roles by social workers |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Awarded Research Masters Thesis |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Social Work |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.grantor |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.level |
Masters |
en_NZ |