DSpace Repository

Differences in Approach to the Internal Protection Alternative: Januzi and Refugee Appeal No 76044

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Neilson, Kate
dc.date.accessioned 2011-07-03T22:21:39Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-26T21:48:24Z
dc.date.available 2011-07-03T22:21:39Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-26T21:48:24Z
dc.date.copyright 2010
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/25008
dc.description.abstract This paper will examine the different approaches of New Zealand and the United Kingdom in the application of the IPA analysis. As Lord Carswell states in Januzi: “Accommodation of these principles has been attempted by two avenues, the choice of which may be critical, for it may lead to different results in individual cases”. The effect of these differences means that it is harder for a claimant to successfully achieve refugee status in the United Kingdom than in New Zealand. As the two approaches can lead to quite different outcomes, it is important to determine how exactly the approaches differ and why they are different. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.subject Refugees en_NZ
dc.subject Right of asylum en_NZ
dc.subject IPA en_NZ
dc.title Differences in Approach to the Internal Protection Alternative: Januzi and Refugee Appeal No 76044 en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit School of Law en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Bachelors Research Paper or Project en_NZ
thesis.degree.discipline Law en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Bachelor of Laws with Honours en_NZ


Files in this item

Blocked
Name: thesis.pdf
Size: 147.7Kb
Format: PDF
Description: Thesis
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account