DSpace Repository

The evaluation of remediation technology: a case of multiple criteria decision making

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Davis, Jennifer Lauren
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-21T01:52:15Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-26T20:30:43Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-21T01:52:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-26T20:30:43Z
dc.date.copyright 1999
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/24842
dc.description.abstract This thesis explores current decision making practices in the selection of remediation technology, with the aim that future decisions will be consistent, justifiable, open to inspection and able to withstand detailed scrutiny. No prior research has collated, compared or critiqued the various methodologies currently in use for the selection of remediation technologies, nor has there been any observation and/or critique of the decision processes used in a real case. This lack of knowledge was addressed through an extensive literature review and observation of a live New Zealand case (Site X) which provided first hand examination of current remediation decision making practices. This study trials and advocates the use of a decision making framework incorporating Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Visual Interactive Modelling in general, and the use of Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis (V.I.S.A.) in particular. The intent of the inquiry was also to research the nature and extent of site contamination in New Zealand; and provide a broad overview of remediation. The selection of remediation technology was found to be complex given the diversity of stakeholder interest, the size of the financial and environmental stakes, the existence of multiple (often intangible and conflicting) criteria, and the paucity and limitations of decision aids used currently in remediation problems. The decision making model used by the Site X Decision Team was typical of many found in the literature, in that there was a lack of attention to both procedural details and the tenets of Decision Science. However, the post analysis of the Site X model results revealed that the decision was robust, and also that V.I.S.A could provide insight into the decision dynamics in a manner which was not possible through traditional, non-interactive methods. The research demonstrates that V.I.S.A., which combines both the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique and Visual Interactive Modelling capability, has the ability to provide a generic, appropriate, consistently applied methodology for use when developing a model for the selection of remediation technologies in New Zealand. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.title The evaluation of remediation technology: a case of multiple criteria decision making en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Awarded Research Masters Thesis en_NZ
thesis.degree.discipline Management Studies en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.level Masters en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Master of Management Studies en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account