DSpace Repository

"Public statements in the law of defamation"

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Taylor, Graham Daniel Stewart
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-07T00:21:37Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T04:22:18Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-07T00:21:37Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T04:22:18Z
dc.date.copyright 1969
dc.date.issued 1969
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/23144
dc.description.abstract This is a tale of two interests. Interests which come into collision in the form of defamatory statements and which the law of defamation seeks to adjust in a mutually beneficial arrangement. These interests are those indicated in the two quotations above: a lie always leaves some scar, and no person has a right to a reputation he does not deserve. As with all forms of law, the balance has varied over the years, responding to the particular needs of the time and the stage of development of society. With the changing form of society the aims and approach of the law have altered, and the type of defamation dealt with by modern courts is often very different from that before the courts in the days of George the Fourth when the law started developing towards its present form. To a considerable extent the days of George the Fourth were pre-industrial, more leisured, less democratic in government, and without mass communications. It was the era of the local newspaper. All this has changed. Today is the era of the national and international press, the era of instantaneous communication across the globe. The word spoken on a television screen may have originated a few milli-seconds earlier in Downing Street or Pennsylvania Avenue. Today's mass communications systems depend on speed. The news must be "hot", must be interesting, and must be presented in a way that demonstrates the special value of the medium concerned. The three modern media (newspaper, broadcasting and television) have each a special value and special strengths in presenting the news. Society cannot afford to deprive itself of one of these media as a result of litigation. The failure, say, of the newspaper industry deprives society of the special value and contribution of that medium. In New Zealand there may be little competition between newspapers, but the law should not be such that newspapers are effectively prevented from "playing to their strengths", for to do so would be to run a grave risk of forcing newspapers into liquidation. This issue of "media survival is central to this study. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.title "Public statements in the law of defamation" en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Awarded Research Masters Thesis en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.level Masters en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Master of Laws en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account