dc.contributor.author |
Cole, Damien Anthony |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2008-07-29T03:03:45Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-10-25T03:09:41Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2008-07-29T03:03:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-10-25T03:09:41Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2004 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/22992 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In the following work I examine the long-standing dispute between the moral relativist and their opponent, who I call the moral universalist. I examine this dispute from a coherentist perspective. For both moral relativism and moral universalism I identify a key conviction underlying the position and I attempt to deliver a theory that accommodates both of these two convictions in a coherent fashion. This involves distinguishing between distinct types of moral principle and showing how the relativist's conviction is a reaction to one type while the universalist's conviction is a reaction to another type. These types of moral principle are not mutually exclusive, however, and a large part of my project will be to explain how each type of principle is able to be included as part of a coherent whole. |
en_NZ |
dc.language |
en_NZ |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Moral Relativism and Moral Universalism: a Coherentist Approach |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Awarded Doctoral Thesis |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Philosophy |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.grantor |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.level |
Doctoral |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.name |
Doctor of Philosophy |
en_NZ |