dc.contributor.author |
Barber, Simon |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-12-03T23:05:50Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-12T02:34:25Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-12-03T23:05:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-12T02:34:25Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2018 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/21005 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
A consensus grows; New Zealand’s appellate landscape is in a confused state. The current appellate exercise involves placing rich, multifaceted and complex decisions into narrow, separate and distinct categories. An appellant’s prospects of success depend on these rigid categorisations. Refusal to acknowledge the flaws of this approach has lead to judicial divergence. Inconsistent judicial application perplexes lawyers, academics, and litigants alike. Reform is necessary. To achieve this reform, I propose formal judicial recognition of respectful deference.
Respectful deference involves jettisoning the troublesome categories, encouraging appellate courts to apply broad, contextual reasoning. It searches for the unique circumstances of a case — not which label fits best. The merits of each case will determine an appellant’s prospects. And there is good news. New Zealand is already headed in this direction. Recent cases have implicitly departed from the congeries of categorisation and into the fertile pastures of contextual reasoning. By explicitly recognising this departure, respectful deference will ensure greater fairness and simplicity for all who encounter New Zealand’s appellate landscape. |
en_NZ |
dc.format |
pdf |
en_NZ |
dc.language |
en_NZ |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Discretion |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Deference |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Appeals |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
From Discretion to Deference: A Necessary Simplification of New Zealand’s Appellate Landscape |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
Victoria Law School |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
Faculty of Law / Te Kauhanganui Tātai Ture |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
180104 Civil Law and Procedure |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
180119 Law and Society |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems) |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
180123 Litigation, Adjudication and Dispute Resolution |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcseo |
970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Research Paper or Project |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Law |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.name |
LL.B. (Honours) |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcforV2 |
489999 Other law and legal studies not elsewhere classified |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.school |
School of Law |
en_NZ |