dc.contributor.author |
Schmidt, Katerina |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-05-23T00:28:11Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-11T21:27:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-05-23T00:28:11Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-11T21:27:57Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2016 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/20204 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper will focus on the difference between commercial and investment banking and the efforts to reinstate the Glass-Steagall act. Many believe the repeal of Glass-Steagall was the primary cause of the Global Financial Crisis.
This paper argues that the Glass-Steagall act was not is not a universal Band-Aid for the United States banking system, and that other regulative actions need to be taken beyond the separating of commercial and investment banks.
Regulative methods include: ring-fencing, capital and liquidity requirements, stricter oversight of credit ratings agencies and more. |
en_NZ |
dc.format |
pdf |
en_NZ |
dc.language |
en_NZ |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Ring-fencing |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Glass-Steagall Act 1933 |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Commercial and Investment Banking |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Should Glass-Steagall Be Reinstated? |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
Victoria Law School |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
Faculty of Law / Te Kauhanganui Tātai Ture |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
189999 Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcseo |
970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrctoa |
1 Pure Basic Research |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Research Paper or Project |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Law |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.name |
GCert Law |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcforV2 |
489999 Other law and legal studies not elsewhere classified |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.school |
School of Law |
en_NZ |