DSpace Repository

Vertical Integration vs Vertical Separation in an Imperfectly Competitive Industry, such as Electricity, with Retail, Wholesale and Forward Markets

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Meade, Richard
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-11T21:39:24Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-07T02:12:58Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-11T21:39:24Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-07T02:12:58Z
dc.date.copyright 6/08/2010
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19168
dc.description.abstract In an imperfectly competitive industry for a homogeneous good like electricity - with forward wholesale and retail markets - should upstream firms (generators) be vertically integrated with or separated from downstream firms (retailers)? Left to their own devices will firms integrate or separate and how does this contribute to welfare? Vertical integration is often viewed by competition authorities regulators and policy-makers with suspicion but are these suspicions misplaced? We address these questions by developing a static and deterministic multi-stage game with oligopolies in both generation and retailing and endogenous choice by generators over the degree of vertical integration. Firms simultaneously compete in quantities in successive forward wholesale and retail markets with retailers able to purchase forward energy from generators. We find that total surplus consumer surplus and other welfare measures are unambiguously better under higher levels of vertical integration. According to many measures we find that "four is enough" i.e. that once a sector has four generators there are diminishing returns in terms of welfare from adding more generators. Moreover full integration is akin to "synthetic" generation - equivalent in welfare terms to adding an additional generator in an otherwise separated sector. Our analysis supports earlier research that shows integrated firms pursue a "raising rivals' costs" strategy - buying wholesale energy to increase the input cost of separated downstream rivals. However by adding forward contracting we also find that separated retailers pursue a counterveiling "over-buy and recycle" strategy - buying more energy forward than they need to meet their retail supply commitments and selling their surplus energy on the wholesale market. This not only protects them against the integrated firms' strategy but in the case of duopoly generation at least ensures that full integration is the generators' only equilibrium choice. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.rights Permission to publish research outputs of the New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation has been granted to the Victoria University of Wellington Library. Refer to the permission letter in record: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/18870 en_NZ
dc.title Vertical Integration vs Vertical Separation in an Imperfectly Competitive Industry, such as Electricity, with Retail, Wholesale and Forward Markets en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit Victoria Business School: Orauariki en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 149999 Economics not elsewhere classified en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Working or Occasional Paper en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcforV2 389999 Other economics not elsewhere classified en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account